In talking with one of our students, (I ask them occasionally what they’d like to see me address in my blog) he said he’d like me to address the “dichotomy between the philosophies “share and share alike” and “the instructor’s right to withhold information because they want to stay better than their students.” For anyone reading who is not in one of our classes I should say that we end every class by saying “Gotong Rojon” meaning “share and share alike”
I cannot address the second half the statement “the instructor’s right to withhold information
because they want to stay better than their students” because that is personal to every instructor, some instructors (many) do feel the need to stay better than their students in all areas, and may withhold information to retain their edge, but not all instructors feel that way, and not all instructors withhold information for that reason.
I can address “share and share alike” vs. “the instructor’s right to withhold information”.
The concept of Gotong Rojon as used in our style of Martial Arts is thusly – “The Javanese term gotong rojong--literally "collective bearing of burdens”” (1) we translate it as “share and share alike” to mean that the class as a whole shares everything in class; knowledge, rewards, punishment, laughter and tears. We are there to train in the Martial Arts, but we are also there to be “family”, albeit a tough love family. Higher ranked students are encouraged to teach lower ranked students the material appropriate for their level, conversely, if one student in the class is disciplined, the entire class gets to participate in that discipline (i.e. if one student is assigned pushups, the entire class does pushups). We are, for better or for worse, working together to achieve our collective goals.
The “instructor’s right to withhold information” is more of a responsibility than a right. It is the instructor’s job to determine if a student is ready for new material, and it is also their job to determine the level of detail at which they impart that information. One example would be the teaching of forms; at the lower levels if an instructor gives the student too much information the student can become overwhelmed, and may not remember any of it, thus wasting both their times. If however the instructor imparts the general knowledge (basic moves etc) without the more detailed analysis, the student has time to assimilate the information without feeling as overwhelmed, then at a later date (perhaps a higher sash level) the student will be taught the more detailed aspects of the form, as well as analysis.
The instructor generally works off of a curriculum of what the student is required to know in order to proceed to the next level of training, and for the vast majority of students, proceeding to the next level is their driving goal. With this in mind, many instructors do not feel that they need to teach the “extras” that they may have learned, until such a time as the student is no longer focused on “reaching the next level”. Some students however do warrant the extra attention, at which point it is at the instructor’s discretion if they want to teach that student the “extras”. Some instructors also like to encourage their students to think about and come up with explanations for “why we do such and such move” on their own, as part of their learning process, and so do not give them detailed analysis, preferring instead to have the student come up with and explain it on their own.
In the end, the two concepts “Gotong Rojon” and “the instructor’s right to withhold information” are almost totally unrelated. The former speaks to the class as a whole in how they should treat one another (including the sharing of knowledge) the latter speaks just to the instructor and their responsibilities therein.
(1)
http://www.iwp.uni-linz.ac.at/lxe/sektktf/gg/GeertzTexts/AsianStudies1962Review.htmFor more information on the concept of “Gotong Rojon” the first paragraph of the website above has a brief overview of what the term means to the Javanese people.